You know my philosophy. The only sensible personal value system is to seek optimal sexual experience, and after that, to have a gentle death. As do most men, I seek women who look young and beautiful, and I like to have love relationships for some time, but not forever. I am not interested in sexual relationships with prostitutes.

That I, just as most other men, prefer women who look as if they have had no or just very few sexual partners is a direct consequence of our fear of sexually transmitted diseases. Other aspects do play a role: our angst not to live up to the qualities of a previous man; the fact that being with an apparently innocent female gives us added confidence; or the likelihood that a girl for which we are the first partner will be more romantic.

Women, and moral institutions expressing the interests of women, call on the sense of responsibility of men not to discriminate against women who are getting older. Not to have a preference for younger women is politically correct.

But it is the wrong strategy.

I am all in favor of keeping women in the sexual arena for much longer than they currently are. And leveling the sexual market value of younger and older women, and the more beautiful ones and the less beautiful ones, will have a positive impact on society overall.

But ordering men, and compelling them, to just start finding older women more attractive is not the right approach. If we want to change men's perceptions, we have to change the social conditions for which these perceptions are the superstructure.

Rigorously controlling sexually transmitted diseases, and rigorously developing cures for sexually transmitted diseases are one such measure that will automatically elevate the sexual market value of older women.

Because childbirth ages female bodies in a manner highly disproportional to their chronological aging, it makes great sense for women to withhold childbirth for as long as medically advisable. I even believe that modern rich societies should allow women who can afford the financial burden to contract other women to carry their eggs, fertilized by the sperm of a man of their own choice.

To limit such consensual arrangements for ethical reasons is doing a disservice to both the rich women who can afford it and the poor women for whom such arrangements could mean financial stability for many years.

Of course there is no hope for such arrangements in those parts of the world that are dominated by the US, as it contradicts their hypocritical religious makeup. But when the rules will be made in Northeast Asia, the approach could become different. After all, any such case could easily contribute a million US dollars to the local economy.

There are, of course, other, less dramatic measures to level the sexual market value of younger and older women. Cosmetic surgery can contribute a huge share.

While "leveling the sexual market value" may sound like the opinion of an egalitarian, I am anything but.

I am in favor of keeping many more women for much longer in the arena of sexual mating games, but I am aware of the fact that there will always be sexual competition among both women and men, and there will always be some woman who fare better than others, just as there always will be some men who fare better than others.

I am not an egalitarian, but I advocate a mating game arena that admits many of those who currently don't feel fit to participate in the mating game, and I advocate a mating game arena of civilized rules, in which sexual contacts are established on the basis not of what we take, but of what we are given. "Civilized rules" also means that adversaries, even though they are in competition, don't hurt each other physically. Just let's be good sports.

That said, I am an elitist. I am often quite successful in outcompeting other men for love relationships with women whose sexual market value is way above average.

My advantage is knowledge-based. It depends on the fact that I know where to go. I could not generate my frequency of love relationships with females of a high sexual market value in Western Europe, simply because there is too much competition around.

But in Southeast Asia, I can be an alpha male. And even though I am in favor of improving human societies, so that as many people as possible (men and women) will have better sex lives, I am aware that my personal lifestyle doesn't match democratic mathematics.

If I myself, during my lifetime, have sex with just several girls and young women for whom I am one of the first sexual contacts, or the first definite one, then (given an approximate worldwide demography of 50 percent men and 50 percent women) hundreds of other men must be content with very few mates, or mates who had their first sexual contacts with other, better, men. Those are the betas. I am an alpha.

I am an alpha neither by birth (no nobility) nor inheritance (since I was 16 or 17, I never depended on financial contributions from my parents or family, nor did I receive them). I am an alpha male based on my intellect, my street smartness.

Not every environment equally accommodates my ambitions. It's my street-smartness that made me decide to pursue my sexual adventures in countries where the conditions to do so are better than in the US or Western Europe.

And it's my intellect that allows me to morally justify my desires, as well as the street-smartness I use to pursue turning them into reality.

I am neither famous, or a star (this would be terribly counterproductive for my exploits), nor am I really rich.

The secret is my success is the knowledge on where to pursue my exploits. I have traveled the world for sexual adventures for many years.

The results of this research, I have not previously published. Nor have I published on the tools of the trade: how to pursue your adventures in specific countries.

But this information is now available for members of the member section of this domain.

Regardless of whether you are 25, or 40, or 55, you can become an alpha male. You can become a man who has a new love affair every week or every two weeks, usually with a woman below 25, or even below 20. Provided you go to places I recommend.

To pursue a fantastic lifestyle at the right places, you only need an independent income of about 2000 US dollars net per month, and the freedom to live a good part of the year in a so-called Third World country.

This is what I charge: 200 euro for the membership.

This is what you get:

1. Information on where and how to organize your sexual adventures... adventures you have so far only dreamed about. Yes, you can turn them into reality. You can be an alpha male.

2. Advice on the best countries to pursue your sexual exploits

3. Personal advice on matters of settling in a suitable Third World country, and on possibilities to generate income while living there.

4. Advice (if desired) on improving one's appearance and physique, for example through cosmetic surgery (which, in Third World countries, often is of inferior quality, and a risk, if you don't know the proper addresses in various countries; I know them).

When you have become a member, first tell us about yourself by email to allow us an individual assessment of your background and the options that would be best for you.

While everybody can be an alpha male, no two cases are alike. Different countries are best, depending on your own race, on your age, your financial status, even your religion. Only one thing is certain: everybody can become an alpha male, enjoying multiple love relationships not just with any kind of women, but women, who, because of their youth and beauty, ran highly for sexual market value.

While the "sexual opportunities" member section provides Machiavellian advice on how and where to have the most and the best sexual relationships in Asia, the site is neither pornographic, nor a prostitution guide.

“Machiavellian” in this contest means honest. Honest to the extent that we analyze the situation in a materialistic, down-to-earth, manner, not afraid to state things which to express is politically not correct.

To advise that Phnom Penh is an easy destination for Western men who seek sexual relationships with local women because the country is so poor and the women are generally willing to exchange sexual services, or general love, for economic support, may be politically not correct. And so is the advice given to older men of Western European or North American origin, that if you cannot have a young girlfriend where you currently live, you can always go to Cambodia.

Whether the options are politically correct or not is not the perspective that is applied in a Machiavellian analysis. The only perspective that counts in a Machiavellian analysis is whether a strategy is effective or not.

As evident from the articles published on my site SexualFront.com, I am in favor of improving societies of Western Europe and North America, so that the largest possible number of people has the best possible sexual experience. The “best possible sexual experience” means more sexual satisfaction from more sexual relationships with more people.

But in as much as the current conditions in Western Europe and North America may not be conducive to optimize one’s own sexual experience, it is legitimate to have an interest in other parts of the world where the current conditions are better suited.

The fact that I, or we, aim to improve the sexual conditions in the societies we hail from doesn’t mean that our primary interest in life wouldn’t be as much sexual satisfaction as we can manage in the world as it presents itself.

Asia's potential for truly rewarding sexual relationships is enormous, provided one avoids places that have been affected by too much tourism, commercial sex establishments, and the presence of pseudo-intellectuals who continue to view all Asians as tribal folks who need to be protected from the evils of modern Western ideas.

It is the primary aim of the "sexual opportunities" member section to provide some guidelines to Western visitors on how to go about it in various countries.

Asia is a fantastic sexual playing ground… for locals and even more so for Western visitors. Just take note of what TIME magazine in 2001 wrote on the topic:

"A continent of 3 billion human beings is getting sexy and kicking the guilt. You can thank satellite television and globalization, and don't forget to say a sincere hosanna to the Internet… There is, it seems, a chat room for anything and everyone. Spouses seeking greater satisfaction, singles who don't want to wait until marriage…"

"TIME has done … a survey on Asian sexual behavior. Thais like to be spanked-some 37% of men surveyed and 34% of women. Singaporean women initiate sex more than other Asian women. Virgins are an endangered Asian species almost everywhere except the Philippines, where 78% of the men say they want to marry one."

"In mainland China …, Shanghai radio sexologist Chen Kai-his business card features a pop-up penis-recently gave on-air advice to a housewife who wanted to know if it was safe to pleasure herself with a frozen cucumber. (Chen's tip: thaw it first.)"

"In backwater Phnom Penh, the ankle-length sarong is starting to get shorter, and sex educators say some 50% of high school boys are having sex with girlfriends, often in fast-sheet hotels charging $1 an hour…"

"I first had sex when I was 20," recalls Jiraporn Thepitak, a sexually active single woman in Bangkok. "When I go back to my home village, I see that girls are already having sex when they are 15 and 16. Before, everyone used to think sex was very important. Now they think it's for fun."

"Asia's sexual revolution is being driven by images from the West … and liberating new phenomena such as Internet chat rooms…"

"In South Korea, which has a seriously severe side, 32-year-old cyberstud Andy trolls the chat rooms to make assignations with single and married women. His success rate: about one a week. (Never on weekends, though, because that's when he meets, and sleeps with, his girlfriend.)"

This much from TIME magazine.

The “sexual opportunities" member section provides definite advice on successful mating strategies especially for Southeast Asia where I have been living (and hunting) for more than 25 years. Information for members is provided as articles as well as through personal consultation (by email), taking into account a member’s ethnic and educational background, as well as factors such as age, available time, and financial means. Obviously, no single mating strategy fits every man. However, practically every man can improve his sexual experience with the right advice.

Among many mammalian species, the dominant male, or alpha male, is the only one supposed to breed and have sexual intercourse. Lower-ranking males can occasionally sneak in and themselves gain access to females. But it's a forbidden act, and will likely be punished severely by the dominant male, if it comes to his attention. However, because even the most advanced species outside homo sapiens have no language or equivalent means to confer information, dominant males, as other members of any species other than homo sapiens, only know what they see themselves.

Human society isn't as extreme in structure as the societies of some species, in which only alpha males breed. But there is a typical tendency for alpha males to seek out as many sexual partners as possible, and genuine alpha males typically succeed to appropriate a much larger share of females than would be their "fair" allocation.

Human males who appropriate a disproportionate share of the females are nowadays not interested in making each of their conquests a permanent wife. The tendency is for a male to use a female a number of times, and then to discard her.

Therefore, in order to assess the degree of polygamous behavior of a certain man, we ought not to look at by how many females he is or has been bound into a permanent relationship at any given time, but solely at the number of different sexual partners he has ever had without getting married to.

For such a statistic, a one-night stand counts more than a lifelong exclusive relationship. It counts more because actually, in many human societies, it is easier to find a wife than a one-night stand (in all of the Middle East), and a man who marries is conceding much more than the one given permission for a single use.

A man who concedes to the conditions brought about by a marriage typically signs over to his wife much of his wealth and financial independence. Because this kind of behavior does require irrationality, there is, under ordinary circumstances, a high degree of reluctance on the part of men to be available for marriage. A marriage is a victory for the female partner, rather than a male conquest.

An alpha male, therefore, is defined as a man who gains access, or copulation rights, with as many women as possible, without allowing a woman the victory of becoming a man's wife.

Let's assume we have a group of 1000 men and 1000 women. Let's further assume that in this group, women have an average of 10 sexual partners during their life span. Of these, an average of 1.5 sexual relationships are with men who are their husbands. This then leaves an overall of 8500 sexual pairings to be counted in establishing our statistics.

My hypothesis is that some 50 men account for more than 5000 of these 8500 pairings.

Some men definitely are more popular with women than others. They are not just a bit more popular.

I assume that in any given society, some 80 percent of the women strive for just 5 percent of the men. But these 5 percent are chronically difficult to bind into permanent relationships, which is why most women, while being occasionally available to alpha males, also settle into permanent relationships with beta (just average and willing to marry) or gamma (below average, but willing to marry) specimens of the species.